
President Trump takes control of Penn Station’s $7 billion renovation, transferring authority from New York’s MTA to Amtrak in a move that promises efficiency and taxpayer savings.
Quick Takes
- The Trump administration has transferred control of Penn Station’s redevelopment from the MTA to the federal government, with Amtrak designated as the lead agency
- Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy claims the federal takeover will save $120 million and improve project efficiency
- The restructured public-private partnership aims to create a safer, cleaner station for New York City
- Governor Kathy Hochul praised the decision as a victory for New Yorkers, highlighting $1.3 billion in savings for state taxpayers
- The Federal Railroad Administration will lead reconstruction efforts under a single grant managed by Amtrak
Federal Leadership Promises Greater Efficiency
President Trump’s decision to transfer control of Penn Station’s renovation from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to the federal government marks a significant shift in the project’s trajectory. The Federal Railroad Administration will now oversee the ambitious $7 billion renovation, with Amtrak designated as the principal entity responsible for development and potential expansion. This change consolidates what were previously separate projects: reconstructing the existing station building and expanding rail capacity. The restructuring is designed to minimize federal funding while maximizing taxpayer savings through a public-private partnership model.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy emphasized the necessity of the federal intervention, citing concerns about the MTA’s management history. The Department of Transportation has withdrawn a $72 million redesign grant from the MTA and reduced Amtrak’s grant for the station’s expansion, cutting a total of $120 million from the project budget while maintaining its core objectives. The decision follows months of stalled progress under the previous arrangement, which involved developer Vornado and struggled amidst a post-pandemic commercial real estate slowdown.
State Officials React to Federal Takeover
Governor Kathy Hochul welcomed the federal assumption of control, framing it as a successful outcome of her direct appeals to President Trump. The governor had previously held multiple meetings with the president to discuss federal funding for the long-delayed project. The takeover effectively shifts financial responsibilities from New York State to the federal government, potentially saving New York taxpayers approximately $1.3 billion while still delivering the modernized transit hub that the city has sought for years.
“In multiple meetings with President Trump, I requested that the federal government fund the long-overdue overhaul of Penn Station. Clearly that effort has been successful, and I want to thank the president and Secretary Duffy for taking on the sole responsibility to deliver the beautiful new $7 billion station that New Yorkers deserve.” – Gov. Hochul
Not all officials share the governor’s enthusiasm. Assembly member Tony Simone expressed strong reservations about the federal government’s capabilities to manage such a complex infrastructure project, particularly given the simultaneous reduction in funding. His concerns reflect broader questions about how the project’s scope might change under federal direction and whether the announced cost savings might result in compromised outcomes for commuters and the surrounding community.
A New Vision for America’s Busiest Train Station
Secretary Duffy articulated the administration’s perspective on the renovation’s importance, emphasizing that the federal takeover represents a commitment to fiscal responsibility while ensuring appropriate investment in critical infrastructure. The administration’s focus on creating a station that “reflects America’s greatness” signals potential design changes from previous proposals, with competing visions already emerging. One notable alternative is a Neo-classical design called “Grand Penn” proposed by Trump donor Tom Klingenstein, which would require relocating Madison Square Garden.
“President Trump has made it clear: The days of reckless spending and blank checks are over. New York City deserves a Penn Station that reflects America’s greatness and is safe and clean.” – Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy
MTA Chair Janno Lieber acknowledged the federal focus on Penn Station’s reconstruction, indicating that the transit authority expects to participate in future planning despite its diminished role. The project’s evolution underscores the complex interplay between federal, state, and local interests in managing America’s busiest train hub. With approximately 600,000 daily passengers before the pandemic, the station’s renovation remains critical to the region’s transportation infrastructure, regardless of which agency leads the effort.
Coordinating Multiple Stakeholders
The federal takeover introduces new coordination challenges among key stakeholders, including Amtrak, the MTA, and New Jersey Transit. Community leaders, including Layla Law-Gisko of Community Board Five, have emphasized the vital importance of effective communication and collaboration between all involved parties. Some stakeholders, such as Samuel Turvey of ReThink NYC, have expressed cautious optimism about the federal intervention, citing frustration with the previous stalemate that had delayed meaningful progress on improving the aging facility.
“The MTA’s history of inefficiency, waste, and mismanagement also meant that a new approach is needed.” – US Transportation Secretary Sean P Duffy
The federal takeover replaces a Cuomo-era plan that would have funded a new station by building office towers and demolishing existing buildings. That approach faced significant opposition from neighborhood advocates and preservation groups who objected to the extensive demolition of historic structures. While many details of the federal government’s specific plans remain unclear, including whether Madison Square Garden might be relocated, the restructured approach represents President Trump’s commitment to efficient infrastructure development that serves the public while respecting fiscal constraints.