Kevin O’Leary’s Bold Statements on Harris’s Policies Stir Controversy

Kevin O’Leary, a prominent entrepreneur, has warned Democrats that Vice President Kamala Harris’s policies could jeopardize the party’s future.

At a Glance

Kevin O’Leary warns Democrats about potential pitfalls of nominating Kamala Harris.
He compares her nomination to Hillary Clinton’s, suggesting both were “anointed.”
O’Leary criticizes the lack of a competitive nomination process within the Democratic Party.
He argues that Harris’s proposed policies could harm the economy and alienate voters.

O’Leary’s Concerns about Harris’s Nomination

Kevin O’Leary, an influential investor and judge on ABC’s Shark Tank, voiced his concerns regarding the Democratic Party’s decision to nominate Vice President Kamala Harris. He warned that the party might be making a “huge mistake” by forwarding Harris as their presidential candidate. According to O’Leary, Harris’s political path may alienate voter demographics crucial to securing an election victory.

O’Leary likened Harris’s nomination to Hillary Clinton’s in 2016, suggesting both were “anointed” without undergoing a thorough selection process. He recalled how Clinton, despite winning the popular vote, lost to Donald Trump due to the Electoral College system. O’Leary believes that bypassing a competitive nomination process weakens the Democratic candidate’s position.

Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary issues urgent warning to Kamala Harris ahead of the election: 'Huge mistake' https://t.co/rMzmj1jRyu

— Daily Mail Australia (@DailyMailAU) August 25, 2024

Criticizing Harris’s Policies

O’Leary also criticized Harris’s policies. He branded her price-fixing proposals as “beyond crazy,” likening them to economically disastrous policies of the 1970s in the U.S. and in countries like Venezuela and North Korea. Harris had proposed banning price gouging to combat high inflation on basic necessities, a policy O’Leary fears will ultimately harm the American economy.

“I’m not saying she’s going to lose, but I would have never let that happen if I’m selling a business. I tell my managers, never bring me one offer, bring me a process, show me there’s no other bid out there that I want, then I’ll make a decision if I’m selling.”

O’Leary pointed out other Democratic candidates, such as California Governor Gavin Newsom and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, suggesting a more open selection would have produced a stronger candidate. He warned that not considering other options could be a severe misstep for the party, potentially leading to the same fate Clinton faced in 2016.

A Call to Evaluate Party Strategy

O’Leary argues that the Democratic Party must reassess its nomination strategy, especially if Kamala Harris fails to win the election. By not running a competitive nomination process, the party risks repeating mistakes from previous elections. If Harris loses to Trump, O’Leary believes it will force Democrats to rethink their approach to selecting candidates.

“Shark Tank’s Kevin O’Leary has warned Democrats that they may have made a ‘huge mistake’ in bestowing the nomination on Vice President Kamala Harris.”

O’Leary acknowledges the complexity of election strategies, emphasizing the importance of a leader who can secure broad voter support. He also criticized the potential increase in corporate taxes from 23% to 28%, expressing concerns over America’s global competitiveness.

This is NOT how democracy is supposed to work. If by chance Harris loses this election, I predict that neither democrats or republicans will EVER do this again without running a process. If she loses it’s because they panicked, appointed her and didn’t run a process. HUGE mistake pic.twitter.com/DNbfVw3Sel

— Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful (@kevinolearytv) August 24, 2024

The Path Forward for the Democratic Party

Kevin O’Leary’s warnings draw attention to the Democratic Party’s internal dynamics and strategic considerations. By highlighting the potential risks of nominating Kamala Harris without a thorough vetting process, O’Leary prompts a broader discussion about the strengths and weaknesses of the party’s approach. Whether the Democrats heed his advice could play a significant role in reshaping their future electoral strategies and outcomes.

If Harris loses, O’Leary suggests that the Democratic Party will have to come to terms with its strategic errors and rethink its future steps. By failing to consider multiple potential candidates, the party may find itself grappling with the consequences of political miscalculations in the face of a crucial election.