Georgia RICO Case Grows Evermore Complicated

Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

( – In a courtroom scene that could easily be mistaken for a political thriller, defense attorneys and Fulton County prosecutors locked horns over what appears to be an overreaching racketeering charge in the Georgia election case. This charge is part of a larger narrative, seemingly crafted to tarnish former President Trump and 18 others, unfairly painting them as desperados trying to hijack power after the 2020 elections.

The spotlight was on Kenneth Chesebro and Sidney Powell, two attorneys and staunch defenders of truth in the Trump era, who found themselves entangled in this legal web. Their defense was clear and justified: the RICO charges they’re facing are a stretch, lacking the essential elements of financial gain or physical threat required by Georgia law.

Manny Arora, Chesebro’s attorney, stood firm against what he saw as prosecutorial overkill: “We’re not attacking the RICO statute itself or its constitutionality; we’re pointing out its misapplication in this witch hunt, where rules are being twisted and new, unproven theories are used as a political weapon.”

However, the prosecutors seemed to be singing from a different legal hymn sheet. They argued that past amendments to Georgia’s RICO law were designed to quash defenses like this, an assertion that seems to stretch the law’s original intent.

Special prosecutor John Floyd even went as far as to claim that the mere prospect of a second Trump term, with its standard presidential benefits, constituted financial gain, a point that seems to dilute the serious nature of RICO’s original financial stipulations.

Moreover, Floyd used the fear experienced by election worker Ruby Freeman to illustrate alleged physical threat, a narrative that conveniently supports their case but seems detached from the defendants’ actual intentions or actions.

The defense highlighted the dangerous precedent this case could set, with potentially “millions” at risk of prosecution, including anyone who dared to question the 2020 election results.

Judge Scott McAfee seemed to recognize the potential overreach, questioning the prosecutors’ stance, which Floyd dismissed as an absurd “sky is falling” scenario. Yet, the concern remains: is this an objective pursuit of justice or a politically charged dragnet?

The judge’s impending decision on the RICO charge’s validity could be a game-changer. As it stands, Georgia’s broad RICO Act is being wielded like a sword against political opponents, under the guise of unifying various actions and individuals under a common goal: supposedly illicit efforts to return Trump to power. This narrative, championed by District Attorney Fani Willis, seems more like a carefully orchestrated political symphony than a pursuit of unbiased justice.

With their trial looming on October 23, Chesebro and Powell, who have pleaded not guilty, are preparing to defend not just themselves, but the very integrity of legal and political discourse in America.

Meanwhile, Trump and other co-defendants, who opted against a speedy trial, await their turn in this unfolding drama, a testament to the continued polarization and politicization of justice in post-2020 America.

Copyright 2023,